What Is Vaginal Mesh?

Surgeons first used surgical mesh in the 1950s, to treat abdominal hernias. In the 1970s, by cutting that same type of surgical mesh into a different shape, doctors began using it to treat female Stress Urinary Incontinence (SUI) and Pelvic Organ Prolapse (POP)—a condition in which a woman’s bladder, rectum, bowels and/or reproductive organs slip down into her vaginal opening.

In 2001, the U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) reviewed the first surgical mesh specifically indicated for the treatment of POP and found it substantially equivalent to surgical mesh indicated for hernia repair. The FDA issued this finding without clinical data. Since then, the agency has cleared without clinical data many other mesh products indicated for the treatment of POP.

One consequence of the FDA’s finding is that C.R. Bard sold mesh made of a plastic material whose manufacturer warned wasn’t suitable for human implantation, according to Bloomberg. The emails containing this revelation were unsealed by the vaginal mesh multidistrict litigation court in the U.S. District Court for the Southern District of West Virginia in June 2013. An executive at Bard subsidiary Davol cautioned employees not to mention their company’s name when discussing its business with Chevron Phillips Chemical Co., the plastic’s manufacturer. Plaintiffs suing Bard can use this information against the company to possibly claim punitive damages.

Mesh Products Are Available In Both Biologic And Synthetic Form

The vaginal mesh products on the market fall into the following four categories:
• non-absorbable synthetic (e.g., polypropylene or polyester),
• absorbable synthetic (e.g., poly(lactic-co-glycolic acid) or poly(caprolactone)),
• biologic (e.g., acellular collagen derived from bovine or porcine sources), and
• composite (i.e., a combination of any of the previous three categories).

Using Vaginal Mesh To Treat POP and SUI

“In general, mesh products for vaginal POP repair are configured to match the anatomical defect they are designed to correct,” according to the FDA executive summary titled “Surgical Mesh for Treatment of Women With Pelvic Organ Prolapse and Stress Urinary Incontinence.” When doctors use mesh to treat SUI, they create a hammock of support under the urethra.

When doctors first started using mesh to treat POP and SUI, they were doing so via incisions in the patient’s abdomen. By the 1990s, doctors began treating SUI and POP by inserting mesh transvaginally (i.e., through the vagina). Many of the problems vaginal mesh recipients are currently suffering are due to the transvaginal placement of the mesh products.

RLG’s Vaginal Mesh Lawyers Will Make Things Easier

The process of demanding compensation for the harm you’ve suffered can be complicated, even if it doesn’t seem fair that you should have to go through even more trouble to be made whole again. The vaginal mesh lawyers at the Rottenstein Law Group believe that getting satisfaction for your suffering shouldn’t be just more hardship. That’s why we do everything we can to streamline the process of helping victims get the compensation they deserve.

If you received a vaginal mesh implant and you believe it caused you pain or injury, contact RLG today by submitting this simple secure form. We will file a vaginal mesh lawsuit on your behalf if necessary.

Join the Discussion

Please note: Comments are encouraged in order to permit visitors to discuss relevant topics. Comments are moderated and might be edited by RLG before being published.

Comments should not be used to ask questions of RLG’s lawyers; if you want to speak with a lawyer, please fill out this contact form or call 1 (888) 976-8529. *Your name and email address will not be published.



rlg Previous Comments

  1. Guest
    on July 11, 2012 at 3:12 pm

    I recently had a hysterectomy where they had complications in my surgery, having to do an additional procedure removing vaginal scar tissue that was caused by vaginal mesh that was put in without my knowledge in my prior surgery. Let alone constant infections that I been having since that surgery that I had back in 2001.

  2. Guest
    on January 5, 2012 at 11:06 pm

    At this point, I am unsure if i have such an implant; could this procedure have been done without my knowledge? I ask this because of experiencing symptoms of the type mentioned in the e-mail. After the birth of my first(1960s) or second child(1970s), I was told by the OB that I had the bladder condition stated and was advised about some exercises, however, no implant procedure was mentioned.

RLG encourages you to reproduce our original content—on your own web site; in emails to your friends and family; in blogs, posts, and tweets, etc.—but we ask that you please attribute whatever you use to us, and, whenever possible, provide a link to the page where you first found the material. That way, whoever reads your excerpt might read more informative material of interest at one of RLG's sites.
You’ve taken enough. We'll take it from here. Click here to contact us now.