Defibrillator leads… that lead to serious injury.
Contact Us Now

For a free, confidential
assessment

Riata Defibrillator Leads Recall Lawsuits

Because they can cause serious injury or death, two medical devices manufactured by St. Jude Medical—the Riata Lead and the Riata ST Silicone Endocardial Defibrillation Lead—were officially granted U.S. Food and Drug Administration (FDA) Class I recall status in late 2011. Although St. Jude had discontinued the products a year earlier, the FDA estimates 79,000 patients still have Riata and Riata ST leads inside them.

What Are Riata Defibrillator Leads?

St. Jude Medical’s Riata Defibrillator and Riata ST Silicone Endocardial Defibrillator Leads are used in “implantable cardioverter defibrillator” (ICD) and “cardiac resynchronization therapy defibrillator” (CRT-D) device implantation procedures. The leads connect to the defibrillators and monitor and regulate recipients’ heart rates by controlling the voltage the defibrillators deliver.

Both St. Jude Medical and the FDA
Have Issued Warnings 

In a December 2010 letter, St. Jude Medical informed physicians that the company was discontinuing sales of Riata Defibrillator Leads and Riata ST Silicone Endocardial Leads. The company followed up in November 2011 with a “Physician Advisory Letter” to doctors informing them that the conductors in those devices because could become “externalized” through abrasions in the wires’ silicone insulation—a condition that could prevent the defibrillator from delivering the electrical impulse the heart requires, or worse, cause the defibrillator to deliver excessive voltage. Both events can cause injury, cardiac arrest, and death.

The FDA doesn’t technically recall drugs itself; the agency issues recall requests to companies, publicizes recalls, and classifies recalls. On December 15, 2011, the FDA classified St. Jude Medical’s November 2011 Physician Advisory Letter as a “voluntary Class I Riata Defibrillator Lead recall.” A Class I recall is the most serious of the agency’s classifications.

On August 16, 2012, the FDA issued a Riata Leads Safety Communication advising all Riata and Riata ST Lead recipients to undergo either two-view x-rays or fluoroscopy to determine if their leads show signs of insulation breaches that might cause injuries.

Riata Defibrillator Leads Might Cause Injury or Death

According an October 2012 Wall Street Journal article, some doctors report having encountered abrasion problems with the St. Jude leads in their own practices “between 2006 and 2009. When these doctors brought the incidents to the attention of St. Jude they say they were told by company officials and field representatives that the incidents were isolated.”

A study of 212 recipients of Riata and Riata ST Leads showed that 15% of them had “insulation breaches,” which cause wire externalization and the accompanying side effects of inadequate or excessive voltage discharges, according to a Minneapolis Star Tribune article. In April 2012, the New York Times cited research showing that defective Riata Defibrillator Leads played a role in 20 patients’ deaths.

Riata Defibrillator Leads Lawsuits Are Being Filed

According to the Wall Street Journal, by early April 2013, 30 people filed St. Jude Medical Riata Defibrillator leads lawsuits in the U.S. District Court for the Central District of California and Los Angeles Superior Court. The plaintiffs allege that the leads delivered unnecessary shocks and that St. Jude Medical should have reported problems to the FDA but did not do so. For example, one woman claims she was shocked several times while lying in bed. When her defibrillator was removed, she was told that her device had faulty wiring.

RLG’s Riata Defibrillator Lead Lawyers Will Make Things Easier

The process of demanding compensation for the harm you’ve suffered can be complicated, even if it doesn’t seem fair that you should have to go through more trouble to be made whole again.

The Riata Defibrillator Lead lawyers at the Rottenstein Law Group believe that obtaining legal satisfaction from those who harmed you shouldn’t require more hardship. That’s why we do everything we can to streamline the process of helping you to recover they money you’re due, and we will file a Riata Defibrillator Lead lawsuit on your behalf if necessary.

If you received Riata Defibrillator Lead with your defibrillator and you believe it harmed you, contact RLG today by filling out the form on this page.

Join the Discussion

Please note: Comments are encouraged in order to permit visitors to discuss relevant topics. Comments are moderated and might be edited by RLG before being published.

Comments should not be used to ask questions of RLG’s lawyers; if you want to speak with a lawyer, please fill out this contact form or call 1 (888) 976-8529. *Your name and email address will not be published.

*

  


− 4 = four

You may use these HTML tags and attributes: <a href="" title=""> <abbr title=""> <acronym title=""> <b> <blockquote cite=""> <cite> <code> <del datetime=""> <em> <i> <q cite=""> <strike> <strong>

rlg Previous Comments

  1. Guest
    on July 26, 2012 at 5:00 pm

    I'm one of the persons that has found out this year that I've got the St Judes Riata 7000 lead wire implanted in Oct. 2007. Now that has brought me to this point in my life and here's what has happened. I was scheduled in Feb. 2012 for the new pace maker/defib and the procedure was postponed because the Chief of Cardiology decided that it would better serve me if I had the procedure done at a more accommodating heart facility. So I was scheduled to be done in Tucson, Az. for the 5th of May 2012, but then it was postponed until the 25th of May 2012. I had the surgery done and the Cardiologist decided that it would be better for me just to leave the former wire inside of me, but they capped it, and now it has fallen into my heart. On July 12th of 2012, I had an electrical shock at 4:30am and I was told that I needed to wait until I could get to a VA hospital so I waited until around 8am on the 13th of July and then I went to the VA in Mesa. I was rushed to Gilbert/Chandler hospital with a heart rate of 266 and the doctor told me that the pacemaker didn't function properly.

RLG encourages you to reproduce our original content—on your own web site; in emails to your friends and family; in blogs, posts, and tweets, etc.—but we ask that you please attribute whatever you use to us, and, whenever possible, provide a link to the page where you first found the material. That way, whoever reads your excerpt might read more informative material of interest at one of RLG's sites.
You’ve taken enough. We'll take it from here. Click here to contact us now.